在西門捷運站撿到別人悠遊卡事件是真的嗎
Past 31 days
Total Visit: 1
There is 1 fact-checking reply to the message
Lin mark this message contains misinformation
originally written by Lin
侵占並不等於假車禍詐財,「侵占遺失物罪」 是行為人把「別人遺失或暫時遺忘而離開身邊的財物」故意且有所圖地據為己有或讓第三人占據。
侵占罪是非告訴乃論,提告後就不能任意撤告,如果被告能跟告訴人達成和解,比如說以金錢賠償對方損失,約定好不再提告,也簽好和解書,那麼比較容易獲得檢察官不起訴處分或緩起訴處分;或者法官也可能看在當事人已達成和解,進而從輕判決,比如緩刑或得易科罰金等。

References


https://laws010.com/blog/criminal-offense/offenses-of-criminal-conversion/offenses-of-criminal-conversion-01

侵占罪構成要件是什麼?與竊盜罪有什麼不同?律師用案例講給你聽!

侵占罪是什麼?有哪些構成要件?我要如何提告侵占來奪回我的財物?律師建議你告人侵占前先等等,其實侵占罪分很多種,刑期也不太一樣,選對法條出擊更有利,找對提告方式還能省下許多時間唷!如果有問題,文末也有免費法律諮詢。

https://laws010.com/blog/criminal-offense/offenses-of-criminal-conversion/offenses-of-criminal-conversion-01

The content above by Cofacts message reporting chatbot and crowd-sourced fact-checking community is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0), the community name and the provenance link for each item shall be fully cited for further reproduction or redistribution.

Add Cofacts as friend in LINE
Add Cofacts as friend in LINE
LINE 機器人
查謠言詐騙