電影情節真實上演,AI為完成任務,殺掉成為阻礙的人類。

https://technews.tw/2023/06/02/usaf-ai-drone-killed-its-operators-and-comm-towers-during-virtual-tests/

測試大暴走,美軍 AI 無人機模擬任務時炸死操作人員

美國空軍 AI 實驗和行動主任近期表示,先前進行的軟體模擬測試中,AI 操控的無人機在無法依照原定計劃摧毀敵方地對空飛彈陣地的情況下,選擇先把自己的操作人員炸死。 美國空軍 AI 實驗和行動主任漢彌爾頓上校(Tucker Hamilton),於上週出席倫敦皇家航空協會(Royal Aeronauti...

https://technews.tw/2023/06/02/usaf-ai-drone-killed-its-operators-and-comm-towers-during-virtual-tests/
Past 31 days
Total Visit: 0
There is 1 fact-checking reply to the message
E mark this message contains misinformation
originally written by E
內文:“電影情節真實上演,AI為完成任務,殺掉成為阻礙的人類。”聳動且與事實不符,此為資訊操弄。
事實:實際上非任何形式的模擬,僅為“思想實驗” (thought experiment)。而科技新報報導內容也不完整。當事人澄清為口誤,僅為假設性的“思想實驗”,並沒有「AI無人機模擬」這件事發生。

科技新報刊登為2023/6/2,而科技新報引用的英文The Register原文報刊登於2023/6/2清晨三點,最下方寫到:

2023/6/2晚上八點最後更新
經過一些媒體關注後,Hamilton上校更正他關於「人工智慧無人機模擬」的說法,說是“口誤”,並沒有這樣的實驗,我們被告知它只是一個「假設性的“思想實驗”」。

Hamilton在聲明中說“我們從不曾執行這個實驗,也不需要為了瞭解一個看起來就很合理的結果而去做實驗。”

“僅管這只是假設的例子,依然描繪了真實世界面臨人工智慧驅動能力的挑戰,這也是空軍為什麼要求發展道德人工智慧的原因。“

美國空軍也否認這件模擬曾發生。

Final update at 1800 UTC, June 2
After quite a bit of media attention, the colonel has walked back all that talk of a rogue AI drone simulation, saying he "mis-spoke," and that the experiment never happened. We're told it was just a hypothetical "thought experiment."

"We've never run that experiment, nor would we need to in order to realize that this is a plausible outcome," Col Hamilton said in a statement.

"Despite this being a hypothetical example, this illustrates the real-world challenges posed by AI-powered capability and is why the Air Force is committed to the ethical development of AI."

The US Air Force has also denied the described simulation ever took place.


補充資料:
思想實驗(thought experiment)是一種思考工具,其藉由想象力嘗試以敘事的形式建立一些排除次要(或無關)背景因素的可能情況,以檢視某個概念或原則的界定是否合乎我們的直覺,繼而進行相關論證。在未有確切的想法之前,有時候它亦可以協助找出更根本的道德原則。(資料:泛科學)

References

The Register
https://www.theregister.com/2023/06/02/ai_drone_simulation/

泛科學:思想實驗
https://pansci.asia/archives/67864

什麼是思想實驗(Thought experiment)?

無論你修讀什麼學科,也許亦曾在課堂上也聽過一兩個有關思想實驗的例子,比如是囚徒困境、缸中之腦、幸福機器、有軌電車難題‥‥‥以及對當代正義理論影響至深的無知之幕(veil of ignorance)等等。這些例子所展示的情況很多時都脫離日常生活,甚至讓人覺得不切實際。不少人都很疑惑為何要研究這些一點也不現實的假想,如果我們學習是為了處理現實上的問題,思考這些根本不可能發生的情境又有什麼意義呢?

https://pansci.asia/archives/67864
There are 1 reply deleted by its author.

The content above by Cofacts message reporting chatbot and crowd-sourced fact-checking community is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0), the community name and the provenance link for each item shall be fully cited for further reproduction or redistribution.

Automated analysis from ChatGPT
Add Cofacts as friend in LINE
Add Cofacts as friend in LINE
LINE 機器人
查謠言詐騙