There are 2 fact-checking replies to the message

Lin mark this message contains misinformation

replied 2,562 days ago｜originally written by Lin

「伴侶法」顯然與婚姻不同，大法官已宣告婚姻自由，是每個人的自由權利，如果立專法，還是顯示有差別、歧視待遇，根本不可行。
尤美女說，特別法的結果是，在形式上同志就是跟一般人不同；專法將會造成「平等的隔離」，就如同美國早期，黑人可以搭公車、上餐廳，但總是要坐在角落。

References

https://udn.com/news/story/6656/2484493
保障同婚為何不能立專法？ 尤美女專業解析

udn.com 提供即時新聞以及豐富的政治、社會、地方、兩岸、國際、財經、數位、運動、NBA、娛樂、生活、健康、旅遊新聞，以最即時、多元的內容，滿足行動世代的需求。

https://udn.com/news/story/6656/2484493

HazelGaGa mark this message contains personal perspective

replied 2,562 days ago｜originally written by HazelGaGa

此為律師個人觀點。

Opinion Sources

https://womany.net/read/article/4229

We're sorry, but something went wrong (500)

https://womany.net/read/article/4229

The content above by Cofacts message reporting chatbot and crowd-sourced fact-checking community is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0), the community name and the provenance link for each item shall be fully cited for further reproduction or redistribution.