This reply
Lin mark this message contains misinformation
originally written by Lin
假的。內文諸多錯誤,此處有兩篇文章,各自點出內文所謂課堂不當教材的錯誤。教了,不等於鼓勵。教材提到愛情,不代表課本鼓吹未成年人談戀愛;提到避孕,不代表課本鼓吹大家要去嘗試效果。在「鼓吹」與「避談」中間,我們有更中性的「正視」。

References

https://medium.com/@mrorz/不當教材在哪裡-回應-22-⋯1NUYxuT4JHwlbkd2nOI87HxkFheA80s9MBwu7lC4
不當教材在哪裡 ?— 回應「22 項爭議性平教材」(上)
https://medium.com/@mrorz/不當教材在哪裡-回應-22-⋯YpsQg3Stq6hhrNDyjrdJO4lokWxCo_wyamIriwvQ
不當教材在哪裡 ?— 回應「22 項爭議性平教材」(下)
The reply is used in the following messages

The content above by Cofacts message reporting chatbot and crowd-sourced fact-checking community is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0), the community name and the provenance link for each item shall be fully cited for further reproduction or redistribution.