This reply
Lopez mark this message contains personal perspective
originally written by Lopez
(1)"EUA審委撤換 不能想聘誰就聘誰"=> (甄選審查委員的SOP如果不妥,必須從制度上來就事論事 來直接辯論檢討。)
(2)"BNT採購 蔡政府也言行不一"=> 民主政體隨時接受檢驗,由選民做判斷。
(3)"心痛600條人命 施明德開嗆"=> 民主政體隨時接受檢驗,由選民做判斷。
(4)"學者批指定裁判 作莊不會輸"=> (這是類比辯論,兩者不一定有實質上的同源性,其類比也不見得「合理」不是直接的 就事論事來辯論。)

Opinion Sources

[1]BBC: 高端疫苗緊急使用 為何引發激烈辯論
https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/trad/chinese-news-57901423

The content above by Cofacts message reporting chatbot and crowd-sourced fact-checking community is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 (CC BY-SA 4.0), the community name and the provenance link for each item shall be fully cited for further reproduction or redistribution.